A classic way to choose a supplier is through a bidding process where tenders from competing companies are evaluated in relation to the customer’s requirements. If the customer wants to hire an agile software developing team instead of buying a software product then a new approach for comparing tenders is required. In this paper we present the design of such a new approach, a so-called Scrum Code Camp, which was used to evaluate the ability of agile teams in two different bidding processes with seven competing suppliers. A design science research approach is used to analyze properties of the two instances of the Scrum Code Camp and identify abstract domain requirements and -components of a Scrum Code Camp with the aim of presenting something very useful to others performing competitive bidding processes.